The Nobel Peace Prize is supposed to celebrate those who make the world a better place. This year's selection has many wondering whether the world has lost its moral compass.
The 2026 prize was awarded to Navi Pillay, a South African jurist who chaired a United Nations commission that accused Israel of genocide in Gaza. The award comes amid a relentless campaign of hostility toward Israel and Jews, in which the atrocities of October 7 are minimized while Israel is increasingly portrayed as the world's greatest villain.
Has the whole world turned against us? How are we supposed to respond?
Natan Sharansky addressed the controversy in a powerful Tablet article entitled “Is the Whole World Wrong?” Sharansky recalls an 1892 essay by Ahad Ha'am about the blood libel, the accusation that Jews murdered Christian children for religious purposes. How could so many people believe something so obviously false? Ahad Ha'am's answer was simple. Widespread agreement doesn't establish truth. Entire societies can embrace terrible falsehoods. Sharansky knows this from personal experience. As a Soviet prisoner of conscience, he learned that truth isn't determined by the number of people repeating a lie or the power of the institutions promoting it.
Sharansky writes our response must be to stand firm in what we know to be true.
How do we keep our confidence and optimism when there is so much negativity all around us? The answer may be found in two birds.
After the flood, Noah faced a world that had been destroyed. The rain had stopped, but water still covered the earth. Noah needed to determine whether it was safe to leave the Ark and begin again. First, he sent out a raven. The raven flew back and forth but provided no useful information. Next, Noah sent out a dove. It found no resting place and returned to the Ark. Seven days later, Noah sent it out again. This time, it returned with a freshly plucked olive leaf. After another seven days, the dove went out and did not return. Dry land had emerged, and life could begin again.
Why two different birds?
The Talmud (Sanhedrin 108b) describes the raven as suspicious and argumentative. When Noah sent it from the Ark, the raven accused both God and Noah of hating it. Only two ravens had survived the flood, and now Noah was endangering the entire species by sending one away! The raven saw danger, hostility, and betrayal everywhere. The dove had a very different perspective and behaved differently. It went out, searched, returned when necessary, and eventually brought back evidence of new life.
The raven and dove represent two ways of looking at the world. The raven sees darkness. The dove searches for light. The raven is consumed by suspicion. The dove gets the job done. The raven sees a world beyond repair. The dove finds an olive leaf. There is a place for the raven's severity and judgment. Evil must be confronted. We need strength and discipline, but those qualities cannot become our entire worldview. If all we see is darkness, we may never notice that the waters have begun to recede.
There are plenty of ravens in the world today. Voices that see nothing positive in Israel and refuse to acknowledge the extraordinary achievements of the Jewish people. There's another danger from so many ravens. We can become so preoccupied with the ravens that we begin to sound like them. We can become so focused on those who hate us that we forget to celebrate all we have. We can become so preoccupied with fighting antisemitism that we neglect to teach the beauty of Judaism. We need to confront lies and defend ourselves, but Jewish identity cannot be built exclusively around those who oppose us.
We need to be more like the dove. The dove doesn't pretend the flood never happened. It doesn't ignore the destruction. It flies over the same devastated world as the raven, but it keeps searching and, eventually, it finds an olive leaf.
The Midrash (Bereishit Rabbah 33:6) presents one view that the dove’s olive leaf came from the Land of Israel, which, according to that view, was spared the full devastation of the flood. Israel is the source of our strength, optimism, and hope. Despite all the hate, there are countless olive leaves to be found today in Israel and amongst the Jewish people. None of this erases the pain or resolves the difficult questions, but negativity is not the whole story.
After the dove failed to return, Noah remained in the Ark until God commanded him, "Tzei min hateivah - Go out from the Ark" (8:16). He seemed reluctant to leave. Why did Noah need to be explicitly told to leave? Perhaps after witnessing so much destruction, the safety of the Ark was more appealing than the uncertainty outside. The flood had ended, but beginning again was frightening. We can understand that feeling. It is tempting to retreat into our own Ark, surrounded by people who think like us, convinced that the world outside is too hostile. Judaism, though, has never been about remaining in the Ark.
The raven reminds us of what we're up against; the dove reminds us of what we're living for. Natan Sharansky reminds us that we don't need the world's approval; we just need to be confident in who we are.
The ravens may be louder. They may dominate the headlines, the protests, and even the Nobel Peace Prize, but they don't get the last word. The dove returned with an olive leaf. The dove found dry land. The dove showed Noah that there was a future beyond the flood. We will confront the hatred, but we will not be consumed by it. We will defend Israel, but we will also celebrate it. We will fight antisemitism, but we will devote even more energy to building a vibrant Jewish future.
The ravens make the noise. The doves make the future.
In the end, the doves win.

