Monday, March 21, 2016

#ComeTogether: Some thoughts from the AIPAC Policy Conference

The numbers are almost unreal. 

Over 18,000 pro-Israel activists from all 50 states (including over 4,000 students).  Thousands of members from 350 congregations and over 500 rabbis from around the country and across the denominational spectrum.  And KJ has over 200 participants in our community's delegation.

Wow!

These are impressive numbers.  Especially in a Jewish world that excels at not being able to come together.

Jews are good at disagreement.  We're good at asking questions. We're good at cheshbon ha-nefesh, self-examination and self-criticism.  We embrace machloket l'sheim shamayim - disagreeing for the sake of heaven.  We cannot and should not ignore the differences between left and right, Republican and Democrat, and the differences of denomination.  At the same time, we must remember that we are a people and a family.  What effects one, impacts all.

In a Jewish world where broad agreement and opportunities to come together are few and far between, AIPAC remains the place where common purpose can be found in ensuring a safe, secure Israel and a strong US-Israel relationship. 

AIPAC is one of the few places in the Jewish community that understands the power of a common cause and unified message, and it's not really even a Jewish organization.  It's all about Israel.

AIPAC is not perfect.  There are plenty of things you or I may want to see done differently.  But AIPAC gets a lot right in its commitment to strengthening Israel and its relationship with America.

In my first hours in Washington, this power of unified purpose even among diverse populations was on display in a number of examples.

1)  My first session was entitled "The Progressive Case for Israel" and was a panel consisting of a Democratic congressman, a Reform rabbi, a Labor Party Knesset member, and a campus activist.  Each came with an extensive resume of involvement in progressive issues like immigration, wage equality, LGBTQ inclusion, and pro-peace activism.  What they each also had in common was the declaration, "I am a Zionist!"

A little later, I attended a session entitled "Why the Next Generation of African American Elected Leaders Supports Israel."  I listened to several young African American elected officials describe the common cause their community has with the pro-Israel community.  In a room full of African American pro-Israel advocates, I have a common cause with a much broader community than I often realize. 

Where else do progressives gather together in common cause, with so many who disagree with that agenda?

2)  Natan Sharansky spoke at the Synagogue Delegation luncheon.  He is a hero of the Jewish people and shared his insights and reflections on issues impacting Israel and the Jewish community.

Here is a quote of Sharansky's that was read while introducing him:

"If anyone would have asked me in prison if I felt more solidarity with Labor or Likud, religious or secular, orthodox or Reform, I would have considered the question ridiculous...I was certainly aware of internecine rivalries and conflicts...but in prison these differences were meaningless..."

(To which I add: They really are meaningless even out of prison...)

"It was the connection I felt with all the people of Israel, with our mutual history and destiny that was the source of my strength."

(To which we all should respond: Amen!)

Let's try to move beyond the disagreements.  There's plenty of time the rest of the year to duke out our differences.  We dare not forget, however, that we have a common goal uniting us beneath the layers of disagreement.

3)  AIPAC makes a point every year about treating all speakers with respect as if they're guests in our home.

This year, in particular, the refrain is ever present and repeated more clearly and more often.

Some people may scoff or roll their eyes.  Why?  What's wrong with a little plug for Derech Eretz, for treating people with respect?  Our world seems to prioritize the loudest, most divisive voices.  Here at the AIPAC Policy Conference, it's actually refreshing to have a chance to rub shoulders with those with whom I disagree.  And it doesn't matter.  We're all here for a common cause.

That's really hard this year.

Much has been written and said about Donald Trump's appearance on Monday night at the AIPAC Policy Conference in a Washington, D.C.  

From the time AIPAC announced Trump would join Hillary Clinton, Ted Cruz, and John Kasich as presidential candidates addressing the convention, the reactions have been pouring in fast and furious.  Ron Kampeas summed up some of the ways to act: Walk in wearing stickers.  Stay out bearing placards.  Get up and walk out when Trump walks in.  Just don't go.  Go but don't clap.  Blame AIPAC.  Don't blame AIPAC. 

I'm sure it will be a typical Jewish gathering: Lots of everyone doing different things.

I get it.  Donald Trump is, putting it mildly, complicated.  It seems unbelievable that he is now the presumptive Republican nominee with a realistic chance to be the next President.

Donald Trump has said things that many consider outrageous, offensive, and even dangerous, and he is clearly not the conventional candidate.  There are many different opinions out there.  Jonathan Tobin offered one in Commentary Magazine:

"Leaving aside the fact that he is  clearly unprepared for the Oval Office, Trump's behavior has been offensive in a way that in a saner world than the one we're living in would have disqualified him for the presidency."

That might be an understatement. (Check out David Brooks' recent op-ed.)

What are we supposed to do in a case like this?

Well, we live in a democracy.  We should respond with our vote and our voice.

We should be frank and honest in our discussions about and criticism of Donald Trump and any other candidate.  There is no place in American public discourse for anti-Muslim statements or even the semblance of justifying hate speech or violence.

We should also take a deep breath and focus on what matters in this (or any) election: the issues and the policies and the strategies that candidates put forth. 

What do the candidates believe and what will they do?  Let's get them on the record.  At AIPAC Policy Conference, we'll hear from almost all of them on the subject of Israel.

Let's get the facts.  Let's focus on positions and strategies and not let any candidate off the hook with more media attention that doesn't provide the people with the truth.

Unfortunately, Trump's campaign, in particular, feeds on the media circus surrounding every controversial remark as well as those who oppose him.  As Allison Kaplan Sommer wrote in Ha'aretz:

"A circus atmosphere surrounding the Trump speech plays directly into the theatrical candidates’ hands.  Trump has shown that he is the master of turning opposition into a boomerang, and using it to fire up his supporters."

AIPAC is doing what it always does: striving to promote a strong US-Israel relationship.  It is not perfect, but it is consistent.  It is staying on message by inviting the candidates to go on the record with their attitudes towards Israel and how America should relate to the Jewish State. 

We may not want to hear from all the candidates who will be speaking - or we may want to hear from Bernie Sanders who declined the invitation.  Let's hear what Donald Trump has to say.  Let's hear from Hillary Clinton, Ted Cruz, and John Kasich.  Let's hear all of their positions on Israel.  Let's hear how they plan to implement their vision.  Let them go on the record in front of an audience of 18,000 activists dedicated to a strong America and a secure Israel, and we'll find out whether they embrace the values of freedom, democracy, and opportunity for all that define both countries.  Maybe one or all will impress us beyond our expectations.

If you don't want to listen, don't.  Thank God, we live in a democracy.  Stay away.  Protest civilly.  Making a huge issue only gives more ammunition to those who divert the focus of the campaign away from the issues at hand.

Life, elections, and so much more are complicated.

We just began reading the book of Vayikra.  There is very little narrative in the third book of the Torah.  There are lots and lots of sacrifices, laws of the Kohein and the priestly service, and rules relating to holiness and purity.  Some may find it a little boring or irrelevant. 

Rabbi Berel Wein, a noted educator and rabbi now living in Jerusalem, teaches that Vayikra comes to remind us of our limitations.  The focus on the sacred which can't be fully understood underlines the fact that we cannot always fathom God's motives or rationalize the world.  We always want to be in control and take charge. The teachings of the third book of the Torah are meant to humble us. There is much that we are powerless to control.

Rather than despair at the state of the crazy world around us, let us commit to remain optimistic and appropriately engaged in pro-Israel activities, election year politics, and being good Jews and good people.


That's a platform worth supporting. 

No comments:

Post a Comment