I
am sure many of you read (or read about) Sheryl Sandberg’s extraordinarily
meaningful and moving shloshim
post for her late husband, Dave
Goldberg. It captured many of the
traditional Jewish responses to tragedy, pain, and suffering. There are no answers, but there is the need
to “lean in” and move forward. This can
be captured by the approach of Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveichik, in which the
question in response to tzores (troubles) is not “Why?” It is “What now? What can be done to move
forward?”
I
find it very powerful that such meaningful and potentially uplifting messages
can emerge from such sad moments in people’s lives. I only saw the sadness in Dave Goldberg’s
untimely passing. Sheryl Sandberg found
– and shared – the strength.
This
idea resonated while reading the coverage of “Jewish
Unity Day 2015,” marking the one-year anniversary of the day when Eyal
Ifrach, Gilad Shaer, and Naftali Fraenkel were kidnapped (and likely murdered
that day as well). The idea is to recapture
the incredible Jewish unity that emerged to support the families and, at the
time, demand the teens’ release. I don’t
know if you heard about the initiative, but it certainly did not capture
anywhere near as much attention or unity as was focused on the teens and their
families last summer.
Why
is it that the sad, tragic, unfortunate, and painful events seem to be far more
effective than the joyous or everyday happenings to elicit messages of
strength, meaning, and unity?
I
am sure there is some sort of psychological, emotional, and even spiritual
explanation. It’s like Jews flock to
shul for Yom Kippur but not for the chance to enjoy a beautiful Seudah
Shlishit. I get it, but that doesn’t
mean I have to accept it.
How
can we create and sustain more positive and lasting feelings of meaning for
ourselves, our families, and those around us?
Not
a bad topic to think about on a long Shabbat.
No comments:
Post a Comment